Just checked, I confused the Metric with the Financial Inclusion Competition.

However, The Scoring Zindi is using here does seem problematic, Whether the submission has all 1s or all 0s it gives the same score, a better score than any model I'm running. That can't be appropriate?

I guess what you focus on is the probability that the classes ur model is predicting is actually correct with a minimal error (log loss).

In this regards, ur score should lie between 0 and 1, i.e, u should be getting something like 0.44, 0.33167, 0.7532. that's just aw it should look

That's not my issue, I'm finding the scoring on Zindi problematic, others are as well if you read the Discussion Board. A model with no technique scores better than a model with technique

I wouldn't say an inappropriate eval metric was used, but i would say an inappropriate test values on Zindi portal mght have been used intentionally or unintentionally.

Perhaps